 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Sarbanes-Oxley ActThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act (officially titled the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002), signed into law on 30 July 2002 by President Bush, is considered the most significant change to federal securities laws in the United States since the New Deal. It came in the wake of a series of corporate financial scandals, including those affecting Enron, Arthur Andersen, and WorldCom. The law is named after sponsors Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) and Representative Michael G. Oxley (R-OH). It was approved by the House by a vote of 423-3 and by the Senate 99-0. The act was designed to review dated legislative audit requirements. The goal of the act was to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. The act covers issues such as establishing a public company accounting oversight board, auditor independence, corporate responsibility and enhanced financial disclosure.
ProvisionsIts major provisions include:
Internal controlsNext to this the company's CEO and CFO should report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports as stated in section 404 of the act. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) ([1]) has issued some guidelines on how management should render their opinion. The main point is that management should use a risk management approach such as COSO (which descibes how to assess the control environment, determine control objectives, perform risk assesments, and identify controls). DebateWhile addressing a number of domestic concerns, the Act has been criticised by foreign regulators for seeking jurisdiction over their national affairs. Smaller companies may be affected by Sarbanes-Oxley if trading with a large company subject to it. In addition to this a large number of them are requiring their smaller suppliers to register with the ISN. An analysis at the Cato Institute website by Richard Bassett and Mark Storrie of Risktoolz, a firm that provides corporate finance services, is critical of a law that criminalizes previously wrong but noncriminal behavior in corporate finance service providers. They conclude that Sarbanes-Oxley "will likely have the effect of harming investors by penalizing risk taking on the part of corporate management and increasing the quantity but not necessarily the quality of financial reports." [2] There is also some concern that the "reporting up" requirements of section 307 of the Act may erode attorney-client privilege. "There is no question that, broadly speaking, Sarbanes-Oxley was necessary," said John A. Thain, chief executive of the New York Stock Exchange, in remarks echoed by others at the roundtable. [3] Legislative Information
There is also some concern that the "reporting up" requirements of section 307 of the Act may erode attorney-client privilege. External links
ForumsArticles
The contents of this article are licensed from Wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License.
How to see transparent copy 01-04-2007 01:21:04 |
|
