![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Sodom and Gomorrah
Sodom (סְדוֹם, Standard Hebrew Sədom, Tiberian Hebrew Səḏôm) was the chief town of a group of five towns on the plain of the Jordan River in an area that constituted the southern limit of the lands of the Canaanites (Genesis 10:19). Lot, a nephew of Abram (Abraham) chose to live in the city. According to the Bible, both Sodom and Gomorrah (עֲמוֹרָה, Standard Hebrew ʿAmora, Tiberian Hebrew Ġəmôrāh, ʿĂmôrāh) — called as a group The Cities on the Plain — were destroyed by God for their sins. Opinions differ as to what the sin actually was.
The Biblical textIn Genesis 19, the final episode in the story of Sodom is described as the angels visit Lot to warn him to flee:
Lot refused to give the angels staying in his house to the men of Sodom and instead offered them his two daughters. The men refused to accept this compromise, and Lot was only saved from assault by the angels. Lot and his family were then instructed to leave the city, and Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed with fire and brimstone by God. It is often postulated that the sin of Sodom was homosexuality and/or rape. But since both homosexuality and rape have always existed in most cities of the world this seems an unlikely reason to destroy a city. Part of the problem with this interpretation is that the term often translated as "Men" more correctly is translated as "people", so there is no real basis for it being translated homosexual. It is not by chance that the passages preceding the events in Sodom have to do with Abraham's hospitality and the gifts of God bestowed on him for his gracious action. First we see hospitality and the way we should act, then inhospitality in that the people of Sodom seek to mistreat the newcomers. The biblical text itself seems to suggest that the sin is based in inhospitality to some (if not a major) extent:
This idea is supported in the Gospels when Christ compares an inhospitable reception to Sodom:
However, inhospitality was not the only sin:
The view of JosephusFlavius Josephus, a Jewish historian, wrote:
(Josephus, Antiquities I: 194-5, 199) Islamic viewsThe Qur'an does not mention the Lot's people as Sodom or Gomorrah, instead the name can be deducted from similarities between the both biblical and Islamic stories. In contrast to biblical text, the Qur'an 7:80-84 clearly states homosexual behavior of Lot's people, which is said to be 'beyond bounds'. The part translated as 'men' is in the Qur'an written as ar-rijal (الرجل), counterpart of an-nisaa' (النساء) or 'women'.
Furthermore, it is mentioned that the behavior was the first among mankind:
Allah's punishment did not come before their arrogant challenge and Lot requested Allah to do so (29:29-30). Similar challenges were done to some prophets, e.g. Nuh, Hud, and Saleh by their corresponding people. After Muhammad it is known that direct God's punishments are postponed until the end of the World. See also:
Jewish viewsClassical Jewish texts do not support the concept that God destroyed Sodom and Gemorrah because their inhabitants were homosexual. Rather, they were destroyed because the inhabitants were generally depraved and uncompromisingly greedy. Rabbinic writings affirm that the primary crimes of the Sodomites were terrible and repeated economic crimes, both against each other and to outsiders. A rabbinic tradition, described in the Mishnah, postulates that the sin of Sodom was related to property: Sodomites believed that "what is mine is mine, and what is yours is yours" (Abot), which is interpreted as a lack of compassion. Another rabbinic tradition is that these five wealthy cities treated visitors in a horrible fashion. One example is the story of the "bed" that guests to Sodom were forced to sleep in: if they were too short they were stretched to fit it, and if they were too tall, they were cut up. This is considered to be an adaptation of the Greek myth of Procrustes. Talmud on SodomThe Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) provides a number of examples of what the crimes of Sodom were. Their sins had to do with cruelty and greed.
In modern terms, the Talmud suggests that the Sodomites were condemned for restricting immigration and for institutionalizing the law of "might makes right". Midrash on SodomThe midrash compilation "Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer" offers a number of reasons why the Sodomites were considered evil.
Again in modern terms, this story suggests that they were condemned for inclosure of the commons, and for perversion of justice. Current usage of the term "sodomy"For whatever reason, the classical Jewish views on Sodom are relatively unknown, compared with a Christian view that interprets the text as referring to homosexuality. Thus the story of Sodom has given rise to words in several languages, including English: the word "sodomy", meaning acts (stigmatized as "unnatural vice") such as anal sex, and the word "sodomite", meaning one who practises such acts. [1] The account of Sodom is part of the basis for many Christian denominations' condemnation of homosexuality. Modern historical approachMost biblical scholars believe that a sin was attached to the story of Sodom to justify the destruction of the cities, which may be based on an authentic account of a natural cataclysm, possibly an earthquake in the region. It is known that the towns are described as lying along a major fault, the Jordan Rift Valley, the northernmost extension of the Great Rift Valley of the Red Sea and East Africa. It is also possible that the sin of the inhabitants appearing in the original text was edited out and lost. The historical existence of Sodom and Gomorrah is still in dispute by archaeologists, with some believing they never existed, some believing they are now under the Dead Sea, and others claiming that they have been found (under other names) in the region to the southeast of the Dead Sea. One candidate for Sodom is a site known as Ba'Hadra. Ba'Hadra was located near the Dead Sea and a coating of sulphur has been found on the site. The theory for the sulphur is that an earthquake opened a nearby pocket of natural gas. Natural gas, being lighter than air, drifted up. However, instead of dissipating harmlessly the gas reacted with the fires burning in the city (the smallest flame could have set off the natural gas). As a result the city was devastated. Skeletons from Ba'Hadra do show an abnormally high syphilis rate for a city of that size. Reformist Torah approach with Hebrew translations"Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom - both young and old - surrounded the house" The traditional interpretation of this story largely stems from the unfortunate translation of the word enoshe in Genesis 19:4. Most versions say "men", which is incorrect. The Hebrew word enoshe is not gender-specific but indicates mortals or people. The word esh would have been used to mean "man" or eshal to mean "woman" if gender specific terminology was meant. This mistranslation gives the impression that just the men of the city had surrounded Lot's house and the further impression that they were all homosexuals out to have sex with the angels. The word enoshe is used in Genesis 17:23 with the word zechar meaning "male" demonstrates this point. There is no Old Testament text in which yadha refers to homosexual coitus, with the single exception of this disputed Sodom and Gomorrah story in Genesis. The less ambiguous word shakhabh, however, is used for homosexual, heterosexual, and bestial intercourse. Shakhabh appears fifty times in the Old Testament; if it had been used instead of yadha in the Sodom story, the meaning of the text would have been unmistakable. As it is, we have no grounds to assume that the men of Sodom wanted to rape the visitors. We simply know that their intentions were unfriendly. Looking at the scriptures in Hebrew, we find an interesting usage of a couple of different words. When the mob cries out "Where are the men who came in to you tonight?", the Hebrew word translated "men" is again enoshe which, literally translated, means "mortal". This indicates that the mob knew that Lot had visitors, but were unsure of what sex they were. The Hebrew word for "man" (utilized in this same passage in Genesis 19:8) is entirely different. One has to ask: Why would homosexuals want to have sex with two strangers if they were unsure of what sex they were? Note that these women that Lot offered were virgins. Note also that the Sodomites were pagans. Virgin sacrifices to idols were a common practice in Sodom. Therefore, it can be concluded in another way that Lot was offering his daughters as a virgin sacrifice to appease the mob in an effort to protect the visitors. By 50 AD we find the first time the sin of Sodom is associated with homosexual "acts" in general. In the Quaestiones et Solutiones in Genesin ("Questions and Answers on Genesis") IV.31-37, Philo interpreted the Genesis word yădhŕ as "servile, lawless and unseemly pederasty." See alsoExternal links
The contents of this article are licensed from Wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License.
How to see transparent copy 01-04-2007 01:21:04 |
|





